DRUG RELATED NITROSOGENESIS, PHOTOCARCINOGENESIS AND ONCOPHARMACOGENESIS OF NODULAR MELANOMA: A CASE RELATED ANALYSIS CONCERNING THE POLYCONTAMINATION OF THE POLYMEDICATION WITH VALSARTAN/HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE AND BISOPROLOL.

Despite the fact that the pathogenesis of cutaneous melanoma is shrouded in mystery, factors that have been neglected or unnoticed until now have come to the attention in recent years, and in all likelihood, they could also be pivotal. These factors, known as nitrosamines or NDSRIs, are characterized by high carcinogenic and mutagenic potency, and some of them have demonstrated these properties to human DNA as well. Unfortunately, these ingredients also turn up as contaminants in about 300 of the most widely distributed drugs worldwide. According to the most recent literature, some of these ingredients are also identified as potent photocarcinogens, as well as human carcinogens. The intake of these carcinogens in the context of polycontamination of polymedication, has been associated for years with the occurrence of melanomas. The need for cataloguing of nitrosamines , as well as their accurate labelling on drug packaging, would help to classify them even more accurately as carcinogens affecting human DNA. We present once again a patient , who developed nodular melanoma within the context of the intake of 3 potentially nitrosamine/ NDSRIs contaminated antihypertensive drugs (valsartan/ Hydrochlorothiazide/ bisoprolol). Pathogenetic aspects concerning drug-induced nitrosogenesis, photocarcinogenesis and oncopharmacogenesis of skin cancer are discussed. Nitrosogenesis' of Cancer as concept in the medical literature has been known for decades, but in relation to other forms of human cancer. Exogenously mediated drug-mediated nitrosogenesis is a logically conditioned and newly defined concept whose significance with respect to the clinical manifestation of skin cancer is only beginning to grow.

Beta-Blockers after Myocardial Infarction and Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Most trials that have shown a benefit of beta-blocker treatment after myocardial infarction included patients with large myocardial infarctions and were conducted in an era before modern biomarker-based diagnosis of myocardial infarction and treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention, antithrombotic agents, high-intensity statins, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system antagonists. METHODS: In a parallel-group, open-label trial performed at 45 centers in Sweden, Estonia, and New Zealand, we randomly assigned patients with an acute myocardial infarction who had undergone coronary angiography and had a left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 50% to receive either long-term treatment with a beta-blocker (metoprolol or bisoprolol) or no beta-blocker treatment. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause or new myocardial infarction. RESULTS: From September 2017 through May 2023, a total of 5020 patients were enrolled (95.4% of whom were from Sweden). The median follow-up was 3.5 years (interquartile range, 2.2 to 4.7). A primary end-point event occurred in 199 of 2508 patients (7.9%) in the beta-blocker group and in 208 of 2512 patients (8.3%) in the no-beta-blocker group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.16; P = 0.64). Beta-blocker treatment did not appear to lead to a lower cumulative incidence of the secondary end points (death from any cause, 3.9% in the beta-blocker group and 4.1% in the no-beta-blocker group; death from cardiovascular causes, 1.5% and 1.3%, respectively; myocardial infarction, 4.5% and 4.7%; hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, 1.1% and 1.4%; and hospitalization for heart failure, 0.8% and 0.9%). With regard to safety end points, hospitalization for bradycardia, second- or third-degree atrioventricular block, hypotension, syncope, or implantation of a pacemaker occurred in 3.4% of the patients in the beta-blocker group and in 3.2% of those in the no-beta-blocker group; hospitalization for asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 0.6% and 0.6%, respectively; and hospitalization for stroke in 1.4% and 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent early coronary angiography and had a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%), long-term beta-blocker treatment did not lead to a lower risk of the composite primary end point of death from any cause or new myocardial infarction than no beta-blocker use. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; REDUCE-AMI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03278509.).

Safety and tolerability of ß-blockers: importance of cardioselectivity.

Cardioselective ß-blockade is generally well tolerated in practice and contraindications to this therapy are uncommon. ß-blockers are a diverse therapeutic class, and their individual tolerability profiles are influenced strongly by their pharmacodynamic effects across different adrenergic receptors. Bisoprolol, probably the ß-blocker with the highest selectivity for blockade of ß1- vs. ß2-adrenoceptors, does not block ß2-adrenoceptors to an appreciable extent at doses in therapeutic use. Side-effects often attributed to ß-blockers, such as erectile dysfunction and adverse metabolic effects are uncommon with bisoprolol and other ß-blockers used at doses which only block ß1-adrenoceptors. Cautious use of a cardioselective ß-blocker is not contraindicated in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma and the outcomes benefits of ß-blockers in patients with coronary heart disease or heart failure are also apparent in patients with concurrent COPD. Starting with a low dose and titrating upwards carefully is important for optimising the tolerability of a ß-blocker. Most people with hypertension will receive combination antihypertensive therapy in practice, and the low-dose combination therapy approach provides a useful strategy for optimising the efficacy and tolerability of a regimen that includes a ß-blocker, compared with up-titrating an existing monotherapy.

Quality of life and cost-effectiveness of convalescent plasma compared to standard care for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the CONCOR-1 trial.

BACKGROUND: The CONvalescent Plasma for Hospitalized Adults With COVID-19 Respiratory Illness (CONCOR-1) trial was a multicenter randomized controlled trial assessing convalescent plasma in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of convalescent plasma and its impact on quality-of-life to provide insight into its potential as an alternative treatment in resource-constrained settings. METHODS: Individual patient data on health outcomes and resource utilization from the CONCOR-1 trial were used to conduct the analysis from the Canadian public payer's perspective with a time horizon of 30 days post-randomization. Baseline and 30-day EQ-5D-5L were measured to calculate quality-adjusted survival. All costs are presented in 2021 Canadian dollars. The base case assessed the EQ-5D-5L scores of hospitalized inpatients reporting at both timepoints, and a utility score of 0 was assigned for patients who died within 30 days. Costs for all patients enrolled were used. The sensitivity analysis utilizes EQ-5D-5L scores from the same population but only uses costs from this population. RESULTS: 940 patients were randomized: 627 received CCP and 313 received standard care. The total costs were $28,716 (standard deviation, $25,380) and $24,258 ($22,939) for the convalescent plasma and standard care arms respectively. EQ-5D-5L scores were 0.61 in both arms (p = .85) at baseline. At 30 days, EQ-5D-5L scores were 0.63 and 0.64 for patients in the convalescent plasma and standard care arms, respectively (p = .46). The incremental cost was $4458 and the incremental quality-adjusted life day was -0.078. DISCUSSION: Convalescent plasma was less effective and more costly than standard care in treating hospitalized COVID-19.

Effect of Concomitant Drugs on Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Hydrate in Artificial Intestinal Juice.

To explore drug interactions involving sodium zirconium cyclosilicate hydrate (SZC) and concomitant drugs like calcium antagonists (amlodipine and nifedipine) and ß-blockers (carvedilol and bisoprolol), we investigate how these concomitant drugs influenced the administration of SZC in an artificial intestinal juice. Initially, we assessed the potassium ion adsorption capacity, ranking it as follows: calcium polystyrene sulfonate (CPS, 54.9 mg/g) < sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS, 62.1 mg/g) < SZC (90.8 mg/g). However, the adsorption equilibrium was achieved in the order of CPS ≒ SPS (within 1 min) < SZC (within 1 h). Subsequently, we determined the residual percentages of amlodipine, nifedipine, carvedilol, and bisoprolol, finding them to be 79.0-91.9% for SZC, 0.38-38.4% for SPS, and 0.57-29.0% for CPS. These results suggest the efficacy of SZC in managing hyperkalemia alongside concomitant drugs in an artificial intestinal juice, with particular emphasis on amlodipine (calcium antagonist) and carvedilol (ß-blocker). Additionally, we identified the presence of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen components from both drugs on the SZC surface following interaction. We also evaluated how amlodipine, nifedipine, carvedilol, and bisoprolol affected the administration of SZC in the presence of potassium ions. Our results indicate that potassium ions and concomitant drugs did not interfere with each other in the artificial intestinal juice. These results offer valuable insights into the administration of SZC in conjunction with concomitant drugs. Lastly, the presented data shows qualitative results in this study.

When a little flutter gets a bit too exciting .

A middle-aged man with no previous cardiac history was admitted to the hospital being treated for thigh cellulitis, during his stay he developed palpitations and tachycardia which on initial ECG showed atrial flutter with a 2:1 AV block and evidence of an accessory pathway. He was subsequently given AV nodal blocking agents in the form of beta-blockers (bisoprolol) to slow his heart rate down; unfortunately, this led to hemodynamic instability due to 1:1 conduction of the atrial flutter down the accessory pathway. This case report demonstrates the importance of recognising pre-excitation on an ECG and the potential adverse effect of administering AV nodal blockade.

Immediate Reaction to Propranolol: An Extremely Rare but Important Condition. A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Beta-blockers involve a group of drugs widely used nowadays. Propranolol was the first beta-blocker available in the market. It is the most prescribed first-generation betablocker and is commonly used. Beta-blocker allergy is extremely unusual. Only an isolated case of an urticaria reaction to propranolol has been published in 1975. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a 44-year-old man. In 2016, he was treated with a daily dose of 5 mg of propranolol prescribed for a diagnosis of essential tremor. On the third day of medical treatment, he experienced an episode of generalized urticaria directly related to the administration of propranolol. He continued with his habitual treatment and he had no other urticaria episodes. A drug provocation test was carried out with gradually increasing doses of the culprit drug. Thirty minutes after a total cumulative dose of 5 mg, the patient had several hives on the chest, abdominal region and arms. Two weeks later, a new drug provocation test was performed to bisoprolol as an alternative beta-blocker, with good tolerance. CONCLUSION: We describe a new case of urticaria secondary to propranolol, presenting as an immediate hypersensitivity reaction. Bisoprolol has been succesfully proved to be a safe option. Bisoprolol is a second-generation beta-blocker, it is available and commercialized worldwide, which makes it a good alternative.

A Retrospective Observational Real-Word Analysis of the Adherence, Healthcare Resource Consumption and Costs in Patients Treated with Bisoprolol/Perindopril as Single-Pill or Free Combination.

INTRODUCTION: The present real-world analysis aims to compare the drug utilization, hospitalizations and direct healthcare costs related to the use of single-pill combination (SPC) or free-equivalent combination (FEC) of perindopril and bisoprolol (PER/BIS) in a large Italian population. METHODS: This observational retrospective analysis was based on administrative databases covering approximately 7 million subjects across Italy. All adult subjects receiving PER/BIS as SPC or FEC between January 2017-June 2020 were included. Subjects were followed for 1 year after the first prescription of PER/BIS as FEC (± 1 month) or SPC. Before comparing the SPC and FEC cohorts, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the baseline characteristics. Drug utilization was investigated as adherence (defined by the proportion of days covered, PDC) and persistence (evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves). Hospitalizations and mean annual direct healthcare costs (due to drug prescriptions, hospitalizations and use of outpatient services) were analyzed during follow-up. RESULTS: The original cohort included 11,440 and 6521 patients taking the SPC and FEC PER/BIS combination, respectively. After PSM, two balanced SPC and FEC cohorts of 4688 patients were obtained (mean age 70 years, approximately 50% male, 24% in secondary prevention). The proportion of adherent patients (PDC ≥ 80%) was higher for those on SPC (45.5%) than those on FEC (38.6%), p < 0.001. The PER/BIS combination was discontinued by 35.8% of patients in the SPC cohort and 41.7% in the FEC cohort (p < 0.001). The SPC cohort had fewer cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations (5.3%) than the free-combination cohort (7.4%), p < 0.001. Mean annual total healthcare costs were lower in the SPC (1999€) than in the FEC (2359€) cohort (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In a real-world setting, patients treated with PER/BIS SPC showed higher adherence, lower risk of drug discontinuation, reduced risk of CV hospitalization, and lower healthcare costs than those on FEC of the same drugs.

Patients with cardiovascular conditions often need to take many pills. This may result in patients not taking their pills as prescribed (i.e., low adherence) and compromise the potential benefits derived from prescription of cardiovascular protective drugs. Simplifying treatment by combining drugs into a single pill can improve adherence and, consequently, patient outcomes. In this analysis using data from real clinical practice, we explored whether using a single pill of perindopril and bisoprolol is associated with higher levels of adherence, lower proportion of patients with hospitalizations and lower economic costs than using the same drugs prescribed as free-equivalent combination in a large sample of the Italian population of approximately 7 million people. We identified two groups of patients taking single pill or free-equivalent combination of perindopril and bisoprolol (4688 patients in each cohort). Over 1-year follow-up, patients taking single pill were more likely to be adherent and were less likely to stop taking their treatment. They also had fewer cardiovascular hospitalizations with shorter hospital admission and had lower healthcare direct costs. In conclusion, simplifying treatment by combining perindopril and bisoprolol in a single pill instead of two may have a positive effect on adherence, outcomes and healthcare costs already after 1 year.

The improvement of routine drug quality control analysis of some antihypertensive drugs using high-performance thin-layer chromatography densitometry method with greenness profile evaluation.

The common antihypertensive drugs are B-blockers and diuretics. For the determination of beta-blocker medicines (bisoprolol fumarate and carvedilol) and diuretic drug (Furosemide), new and accurate chromatographic method has been developed. The separation was achieved using a developing system that includes chloroform:methanol:ethyl acetate:ammonia (6:2:2:0.2 by volume) as a mobile phase and the bands were detected at 240 nm. The concentration ranges were 5-25, 1-7, and 1-3.5 µg/band for bisoprolol fumarate, carvedilol, and furosemide, respectively. This chromatographic approach is the first methodology for simultaneously determining bisoprolol fumarate, carvedilol, and furosemide in their pure forms and in their pharmaceutical dosage forms. The advantages of using known analytical procedures are their simplicity, speed, cost effectiveness, lack of laboriousness, and ability to save time as the three tablets are determined in one step and can be used for routine analysis of the investigated combinations in quality control laboratories. According to International Conference of Harmonization guidelines, the established procedures have been validated, and the results were statistically compared to those obtained by the reported reversed-phase-high-performance liquid chromatography methods using Student's t-test and F-test, with no significant difference between them, indicating that the proposed methods can be used for routine drug quality control analysis.

METASTATIC NODULAR MELANOMA DEVELOPING ON NEVUS SPILUS DURING INTAKE OF BETA BLOCKERS (BISOPROLOL/NEBIVOLOL) AND ACE INHIBITORS (PERINDOPRIL). POTENTIAL LINKS TО THE DRUG RELATED NITROSOGENESIS/CARCINOGENESIS, DUNNING-KRUGER EFFECT AND GENETIC WEAPONS OF THE NEW GENERATION.

Drug-induced Nitrosogenesis/Carcinogenesis turns out to be a ubiquitous, pervasive, large-scale, poorly controllable concept for the academic community, which underlies the long-term, permanent modification of the human genome by contact with nitrosamines/NDSRIs, which ultimately leads to the generation of diverse cancers, but also melanoma in particular. The discovery of a (currently) unclassifiable number of nitroso derivatives/genome modifiers in the most commonly distributed drugs worldwide (in about 300 preparations according to the FDA/includes beta blockers/bisoprolol/nebivolol and ACE inhibitors/perindopril), their forced tolerability, attributed as a necessity or lack of alternative also to the present (but also to future periods), and their proven carcinogenicity (already 70 years ago), suggest a kind of creepy form of experiment to which public health is subjected worldwide. The creation of a universal nitroso-comfort of pharmaceutical companies and the regulation of a permanent intake of carcinogens in drugs for years to come, but also decades back, suggest possible cartel agreements between the regulation/distribution unit and that of production cycles. These "agreements" are becoming increasingly evident and in all likelihood position nitrosogenesis from a until recently unknown element, to a pathogenetic factor of paramount importance. Melanoma could be viewed precisely as the controlled end gene-modified product of drug-mediated nitrosogenesis/carcinogenesis, proven to be a locoregional (but not only) phenomenon hundreds if not thousands of times. The dilemma stays: Are the nitrosamines in drugs genetic weapons, ethnic bioweapons for silent war ? The nitrosogenesis concerning melanoma leads to the logical conclusion that cancer is in fact a largely controlled set event or, according to others, a forced necessity of evolutionary globalization processes to purge the population in certain regions. In favor of this statement indicative are namely: 1) lack of regulatory control/results of such conducted, 2) complete information veil for the end user regarding contamination with carcinogens/nitrosamines in certain batches or all batches of drugs, 3) misinformation and lack of transparency regarding the concept of nitrosogenesis also for the academic community, as well as 4) the impunity to pharmaceutical conglomerates after criminal negligence/controlled criminogenicity proven thousands of times by the FDA/EMA leading to regulatory controlled drug mediated genocide of the human population in certain areas on a daily basis. And most important of all: 5) the lack of refusal to eliminate these drugs, i.e. - the imposition of forced tolerance at any cost. It is extremely unfortunate that the mentioned and identified grotesque/situation, its tolerance on a global scale, lead to a misjudgement of the significance of real tumor inducers within the global health map//statistics as well as melanoma. The focus of prevention is being displaced, while the incidence of cancer in general and that of melanoma is skyrocketing. Nitrosamines could be defined as the newest, modern, until recently invisible and unknown, but -controllable form of genetic weapon to modify the human genome. Because of these very facts, the likelihood that clinicians and the academic community are in the frozen and permanent state of the Dunning-Kruger effect is very real. Certain globalization regulatory elements create problems and assignments that must be solved ˝competently˝ by incompetent, fully regulatable compartments. As their state of competence depends again and entirely on ˝their incompetence˝. Until now. After the formalization of the concept of Nitrosogenesis (as a form of genetic weapon) and melanoma for example, but not only, it remains to be seen whether universal incompetence will become a guarantee of competence and the survival. Or- will it remain again at the level of globalized, criminally conditioned, appointed and regulated from above "competent incompetence". The dilemmas to regulators and manufacturers remain open : Is it competent to take drugs that contain carcinogens/nitrosamines? Is it competent for this issue to continue for decades with impunity? Is it competent for regulators not to inform consumers about the presence of carcinogens/genome modifiers in medicines for decades? Is it competent for certain regions to be affected by nitrosamine contamination and not others? Is it competent not to reflect this in regional and global health bulletins on side effects? Is it competent to make thousands of times the profits from the modified genetic map business, regulated and legally initiated through the intake of carcinogens? Is it competent to have the concentration of carcinogens within polymedication exceeding many times the daily allowable doses of carcinogens and have no solution for this? Is it competent, when the intake of nitrosamines in medicines is associated with the generation of melanomas and heterogeneous cancers- to have no alternative to this or when one is available- to conceal it skillfully? Is it competent to determine carcinogenic activity based on mutagenic tests? Is it competent to be polyincompetent within a framework of mass (in)competence? We report systemically administered drugs for the treatment of high blood pressure from the group of beta blockers (bisoprolol/nebivolol) and ACE inhibitors (perindopril) that have been identified by regulators in the face of FDA as hypothetically contaminated with nitrosamines/NDSRIs with a carcinogenic potency between 4 and 5, respectively. Within this cumulative intake, (which according to the regulators was not at risk of developing cancerous forms), similar to other cases in the world literature, the patient developed a relatively short-term, metastatic nevus spilus-based nodular melanoma. The paper analyses not only the role of nitrosogenesis, but also that of two pregnancies and painful sunburns as potential cofactors for melanoma genesis. Academic attention is drawn to the potential impact of drug-mediated nitrosogenesis/carcinogenesis. Nitrosamines in the framework of polycontamination and polymedication could also be identified as one of the most effective, until recently unknown, modern generation genetic weapons for modifying the human genome and controlling cancer. Moreover, they could be controllably applied and skillfully targeted. At least until now. The officialization of carcinogens in more than 250 of the most common drugs and the clinico-pathological correlations concerning the development of cancer/melanoma in poorly controlled geographical regions represent a kind of in vivo prospective study to determine precisely the real carcinogenic role of nitrosamines to date.

Efficacy and Safety of Bisoprolol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of bisoprolol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Research Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statements. The primary outcome measures analyzed included: Pulmonary function(FEV1, FEV1%, FVC), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), adverse events and inflammatory cytokines(IL-6, IL-8, CRP). Results: Thirty-five studies were included with a total of 3269 study participants, including 1650 in the bisoprolol group and 1619 in the control group. The effect of bisoprolol on lung function in patients with COPD, FEV1, MD (0.46 [95% CI, 0.27 to 0.65], P=0.000), FEV1%, MD (-0.64 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.86], P=0.000), FVC, MD (0.20 [95% CI, 0.05 to 0.34], P=0.008), the results all showed a statistically significant result. The effect of bisoprolol on 6MWD in COPD patients, MD (1.37 [95% CI, 1.08 to 1.66], P=0.000), which showed a statistically significant result. The occurrence of adverse events in COPD patients treated with bisoprolol, RR (0.83 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.26], P=0.382), resulted in no statistical significance. The effect of bisoprolol on inflammatory cytokines in COPD patients, IL-6, MD (-1.16 [95% CI, -1.67 to -0.65], P=0.000), IL-8, MD (-0.94 [95% CI, -1.32 to -0.56], P=0.000), CRP, MD (-1.74 [95% CI, -2.40 to -1.09], P=0.000), the results were statistically significant. We performed a subgroup analysis of each outcome indicator according to whether the patients had heart failure or not, and the results showed that the therapeutic effect of bisoprolol on COPD did not change with the presence or absence of heart failure. Conclusion: Bisoprolol is safe and effective in the treatment of COPD, improving lung function and exercise performance in patients with COPD, and also reducing inflammatory markers in patients with COPD, and this effect is independent of the presence or absence of heart failure.

Genetic polymorphisms in ADRB1, ADRB2 and CYP2D6 genes and response to beta-blockers in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Betablockers (BBs) are prescribed for ischaemia in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In Spain, bisoprolol and carvedilol are the most prescribed BBs, but patients often had to discontinue them due to adverse effects. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ADRB1, ADRB2 and CYP2D6 genes have strong evidence of pharmacogenetic association with BBs in heart failure or hypertension, but the evidence in ACS is limited. Therefore, our study focuses on investigating how these genes influence the response to BBs in ACS patients. We analysed the association between SNPs in ADRB1 Gly389Arg (rs1801253) and Ser49Gly (rs1801252), ADRB2 Gly16Arg (rs1042713) and Glu27Gln (rs1042714), and CYP2D* 6 (*2- rs1080985, *4- rs3892097, *10 - rs1065852) and the occurrence of bradycardia/hypotension events during one year of follow-up. We performed an observational study and included 285 ACS-PCI-stent patients. A first analysis including patients treated with bisoprolol and a second analysis including patients treated with other BBs were performed. We found that the presence of the G allele (Glu) of the ADRB2 gene (rs1042714; Glu27Gln) conferred a protective effect against hypotension-induced by BBs; OR (CI 95%) = 0,14 (0,03-0,60), p < 0.01. The ADRB2 (rs1042713; Gly16Arg) GG genotype could also prevent hypotensive events; OR (CI 95%) = 0.49 (0.28-0.88), p = 0015. SNPs in ADRB1 and CYP2D6 * 2, CYP2D6 * 4 weren´t associated with primary events. The effect of CYP2D6 * 10 does not seem to be relevant for the response to BBs. According to our findings, SNPs in ADRB2 (rs1042713, rs1042714) could potentially affect the response and tolerance to BBs in ACS-patients. Further studies are necessary to clarify the impact of ADRB2 polymorphisms.

Further exploration of the collision-induced dissociation of select beta blockers: Acebutolol, atenolol, bisoprolol, carteolol, and labetalol.

Beta blockers are a class of drugs commonly used to treat heart-related diseases; they are also regulated under the World Anti-Doping Agency. Tandem mass spectrometry is often used in the pharmaceutical industry, clinical analysis laboratory, and antidoping laboratory for detection and characterization of drugs and their metabolites. A deeper chemical understanding of dissociation pathways may eventually lead to an improved ability to predict tandem mass spectra of compounds based strictly on their chemical structure (or vice versa), which is especially important for characterization of unknowns such as emerging designer drugs or novel metabolites. In addition to providing insights into dissociation pathways, the use of energy-resolved breakdown curves can produce improved selectivity and lend insights into optimal fragmentation conditions for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry LC-MS/MS workflows. Here, we perform energy-resolved collision cell and multistage ion trap collision-induced dissociation-mass spectrometry (CID-MS) experiments, along with complementary density functional theory calculations, on five beta blockers (acebutolol, atenolol, bisoprolol, carteolol, and labetalol), to better understand the details of the pathways giving rise to the observed MS/MS patterns. Results from this work are contextualized within previously reported literature on these compounds. New insights into the formation of the characteristic product ion m/z 116 and the pathway leading to characteristic loss of 77 u are highlighted. We also present comparisons of breakdown curves obtained via qToF, quadrupole ion trap, and in-source CID, allowing for differences between the data to be noted and providing a step toward allowing for improved selectivity of breakdown curves to be realized on simple instruments such as single quadrupoles or ion traps.

MORPHEAFORM BCC OF ALA NASI: A SUCCESSFUL DERMATOSURGICAL APPROACH BY TRANSPOSITION FLAP FROM THE ADJACENT AREA. CONTAMINATION OF VENLAFAXINE, BISOPROLOL AND OLANZAPINE WITH NITROSAMINES/NDSRIS: THE MOST LIKELY CAUSE OF SKIN CANCER DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION.

Two steps are able to lead to a significant decrease in the incidence of skin cancer overall and/or to its parallel and successful surgical treatment. The first step concerns its non-occurrence or less frequent clinical manifestation and is largely related to the modern concept known as prevention, but not the one mainly related to solar radiation, but: 1) informing patients about the possible contamination of certain drugs with carcinogens/nitrosamines/NDSRIs and 2) making clinicians aware of the modern concept of limited to completely eliminated intake of nitrosamines/NDSRIs in medications. The ineffectiveness of either of these entities could in all likelihood be seen as one of the major causes of the headline growth in the incidence of skin cancer and keratinocytic cancer in particular. It is also because of this fact that the sun protection so recommended and advertised has been shown to be ineffective, yet it remains universally advertised. Polycontamination with Nitrosamines/NDSRIs within multimedication in polymorbid patients is the most serious obstacle (at the moment) for the current concept of skin cancer prevention to become a reality. The announced official "hypothetical contamination" of more than 250 drugs worldwide by the FDA in April 2023, and the establishment of permissive concentrations for 5 classes of carcinogenic activity of the nitrosamines/NDSRIs - effectively make any preventive step more than impossible or meaningless. The open question remains, how were the 5 subgroups for hypothetical carcinogenic potency of the carcinogens contained in the drugs created? On the basis of what data? What tumors occurred when these concentrations were exceeded? Data that remains hidden from the public and end users, but also data that guarantees the development of real (not hypothetical) skin tumours. The new FDA regulations also do not comment on the issues concerning the use of "hypothetical carcinogens" in the context of polycontamination and polymedication in polymorbid patients. Because of this fact, the follow-up of actual carcinomas after the intake of multiple "hypothetical carcinogens" would also seem to be not unimportant. And it turns out to be quite real and sobering to say the least. The second step, which concerns the successful treatment of skin cancer, is its early surgical treatment. This is the most promising approach, regardless of whether patients are exposed to permanent intake of carcinogens/nitrosamines/NDSRIs in the drugs. We report an 86-year-old patient, who, as part of his polymedication and polymorbidity, takes 3 drugs that, according to the official FDA list of 2023, have strictly defined reference limits for potentially available "hypothetical carcinogens": bisoprolol/carcinogenic potency class 4, olanzapine/ carcinogenic potency class 5 and venlafaxine/ carcinogenic potency class 1. The described patient developed "real carcinoma" after combined long-term intake of the "hypothetical carcinogens" announced in the official FDA lists from April 2023. Proceeding from common sense, regulators in the face of the FDA should have already long observed the development of a heterogeneous type of tumors to be able to determine 1) the potency of the 5 subclasses of carcinogens in the drugs and 2) their reference values. Moreover- they should also have the exact information why which carcinogen in which drug causes which type of tumor. Otherwise, the FDA should not announce its detailed recommendations to drug manufacturers. The present patient was successfully treated surgically by a transposition adjacent flap. The optimal dermatosurgical and reconstructive methodologies for the treatment of tumors in the ala nasi area are discussed.

NITROSAMINES IN COMMONLY PRESCRIBED ANTIHYPERTENSIVES AND THE (UN)CONTROLLED DRUG-INDUCED SKIN CANCER: SIMULTANEOUS DEVELOPMENT OF CUTANEOUS MELANOMA AND MULTIPLE BCC AFTER CONCOMITANT ADMINISTRATION OF BISOPROLOL AND FUROSEMIDE.

The era of nitrosogenesis is the era that is conditioned by the permanent and prolonged intake of carcinogens/mutagens, also known as nitrosamines/NDSRIs in the context of polymedication/polycontamination in polymorbid patients. Until recently, the favoured and universally accepted thesis by the scientific community that polymorbidity determines the risk of developing cancer has been shown to be weakly substantiated and superseded by the more modern notion that: it is the polycontamination with carcinogens in the context of concomitant medication/ polymorbidity that determines to a large extent the risk of developing heterogeneous cancers, including skin cancer: keratinocytic and melanocytic. The FDA is the organization that first pulled back the curtain on the backstage back in 2018 on this topic. It was not until 2023 that the FDA again catalogued over 250 drugs that are affected by contamination with carcinogens/mutagens/NDSRIs having varying carcinogenic potencies graded between 1 to 5. The expectations of clinicians and patients globally at the moment remain hopeful that the diplomatic recommendations of regulators will soon be replaced by more restrictive regimes and sanctions. The reason for the need to clarify this issue quickly is due to the following circumstances: 1) The reassuring calls and analyses of the regulators that the minimum intake of carcinogens ( nitrosamines or intake within reference values) , could not become a threat to the health of patients even after 70 years of intake, appear to be rather inconsistent; 2) Lack of any official data on any drug batch that has at least been declared by the FDA/EMA (if declared at all) as potentially contaminated; 3) Another not insignificant reason is that a number of scientific publications are indicative of exactly the opposite: short-term concomitant intake of polycontaminated drugs leads to short-term cancer development while shortening cumulative survival and quality of life for those affected. Only the transparency of the results of checks carried out on the presence of carcinogens in drug batches can guarantee peace of mind, and this in turn can be guaranteed by the regulatory authorities. 4) In parallel, the number of clinical data indicating an association between the intake of potentially nitrosamine-contaminated drugs (mainly for high blood pressure, but not only) and - in particular - keratinocytic and/or melanocytic skin cancer is growing avalanche-like. The dramatic increase in skin cancer in general/ worldwide is in absolute contradiction to the continuous explanations that the most important factor in the generation of skin cancer is ultraviolet light and sunburn: the incidence of skin cancer is increasing despite the widespread intensive use of sunscreen protection creams, the lack of any sun exposure in certain groups of patients, and its occurrence in areas not exposed to solar radiation. It follows only that solar radiation is not the only and perhaps not the most important factor determining the occurrence and progression of skin cancer. We report another concomitant intake of potentially nitrosamine contaminated blood pressure medications: bisoprolol and furosemide, taken over a period of 7 years that resulted in the concurrent occurrence of a medium-thickness cutaneous melanoma and 2 basal cell carcinomas. Successful surgical treatment of the tumors was performed, and the role of concurrent administration of ˝hypothetical˝ class 4 carcinogens within the framework of polymedication, polycontamination, and polymorbidity is discussed.

Unilateral adrenalectomy for a drug-resistant bilateral primary aldosteronism with heart failure: pathophysiology and surgical indication.

BACKGROUND: Patients with bilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) generally are treated with antihypertensive drugs, but optimal treatment for patients with complications due to refractory hypertension has not been established. In this report, we present a case with bilateral PA who presented with persistent hypertension, despite treatment with 6 drugs, and left-dominant heart failure, which was improved after unilateral adrenalectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 61-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of severe left-dominant heart failure. His heart rhythm was atrial fibrillation and the left ventricle was diffusely hypertrophic and hypokinetic. Coronary arteries were normal on coronary arteriogram. Primary aldosteronism was suspected based on severe hypokalemia (2.5 mEq/L) and plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC; 1,410 pg/mL). Although computed tomography (CT) showed a single left cortical nodule, adrenal vein sampling (AVS) indicated bilateral PA. Early in the case, heart failure and hyperkalemia in this patient were improved by treatment with a combination of 6 antihypertensive drugs (spironolactone 25 mg/day, eplerenone 100 mg/day, azosemide 60 mg/day, tolvaptan 7.5 mg/day, enalapril 5 mg/day, and bisoprolol fumarate 10 mg/day); however, heart failure relapsed after four months of treatment. We hypothesized that hypertension caused by excess aldosterone was inducing the patient's heart failure. In order to reduce aldosterone secretory tissue, a laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed for the left adrenal gland, given the higher level of aldosterone from the left gland compared to the right. Following surgery, the patient's heart failure was successfully controlled despite the persistence of high PAC. Treatment with anti-hypertensive medications was reduced to two drugs (eplerenone 100 mg/day and bisoprolol fumarate 10 mg/day). In order to elucidate the mechanism of drug resistance, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays were performed to assess the expression of steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1), a regulator of steroid synthesis in adrenal tissue. IHC and RT-PCR demonstrated that the expression of SF-1 in this patient (at both the protein and mRNA levels) was higher than that observed in unilateral PA cases that showed good responsivity to drug treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral adrenalectomy to reduce aldosterone secretory tissue may be useful for patients with drug-refractory, bilateral PA. Elevated expression of SF-1 may be involved in drug resistance in PA.

Potential Interaction between Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate and Prescription Drugs in Artificial Intestinal Juice.

This study evaluated the interaction between sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) and several commonly used concomitant drugs, such as carvedilol, bisoprolol, imidapril, atorvastatin and azilsartan. The residual rate of adsorption 6 h after starting the experiment followed the order carvedilol (0.36%) < bisoprolol (19.7%) < imidapril (81.2%) < atorvastatin (86.5%) < azilsartan (87.9%) in artificial intestinal juice (pH 6.8). In addition, the pKa of carvedilol and bisoprolol was 8.0 and 9.6 and that of atorvastatin, azilsartan, and imidapril was 4.5, 6.1, and 2.4, respectively. These results indicate that the form (ionic or uncharged) of each drug is important to its reaction with SPS. Moreover, we demonstrated the effect of potassium ions (concentration of 1000 or 2000 mg/L) on the adsorption of concomitant drugs onto SPS in artificial intestinal juice. Our results show that the residual rate of adsorption of carvedilol and bisoprolol increases with increasing concentration of potassium ions whereas adsorption of potassium ions onto SPS was unaffected by carvedilol and bisoprolol under our experimental conditions. Finally, the obtained results revealed that interactions between SPS and carvedilol or bisoprolol readily occur in artificial intestinal juice.

Differential Effects of the Betablockers Carvedilol, Metoprolol and Bisoprolol on Cardiac Kv4.3 (Ito) Channel Isoforms.

Cardiac Kv4.3 channels contribute to the transient outward K+ current, Ito, during early repolarization of the cardiac action potential. Two different isoforms of Kv4.3 are present in the human ventricle and exhibit differential remodeling in heart failure (HF). Cardioselective betablockers are a cornerstone of HF with reduced ejection fraction therapy as well as ventricular arrhythmia treatment. In this study we examined pharmacological effects of betablockers on both Kv4.3 isoforms to explore their potential for isoform-specific therapy. Kv4.3 isoforms were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and incubated with the respective betablockers. Dose-dependency and biophysical characteristics were examined. HEK 293T-cells were transfected with the two Kv4.3 isoforms and analyzed with Western blots. Carvedilol (100 µM) blocked Kv4.3 L by 77 ± 2% and Kv4.3 S by 67 ± 6%, respectively. Metoprolol (100 µM) was less effective with inhibition of 37 ± 3% (Kv4.3 L) and 35 ± 4% (Kv4.3 S). Bisoprolol showed no inhibitory effect. Current reduction was not caused by changes in Kv4.3 protein expression. Carvedilol inhibited Kv4.3 channels at physiologically relevant concentrations, affecting both isoforms. Metoprolol showed a weaker blocking effect and bisoprolol did not exert an effect on Kv4.3. Blockade of repolarizing Kv4.3 channels by carvedilol and metoprolol extend their pharmacological mechanism of action, potentially contributing beneficial antiarrhythmic effects in normal and failing hearts.